Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
R5
-
Patient Care
-
Condition
-
-
Larry McKnight / David Riddle : 5-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
-
R5
Description
Condition recordedDate and recorder definitions are not aligned
- recordedDate prefers the FIRST (oldest) sending system's date
- recorder prefers the LAST (most recent) author who takes responsibility for the content
Do we want to rename the elements since they aren't "paired" together as the names might imply?
Per jlyle's email on 11/30/2021
2020-06-10 MCC Care Plan Meeting - Patient Care - Confluence (hl7.org) created
FHIR-27808Clarification is needed on definition and use of RecordedDate - Jira (hl7.org), resulting in this text added to Recorded Date:"If the recordedDate is known via a sending system, it is preferred that the receiving system preserve the date. If the recorded date is not provided by the sending system, it is acceptable for the receiving system to assert their system-generated date."
2020 Sept WGM Patient Care Agenda and Minutes - Patient Care - Confluence (hl7.org) clarified that the reason for this logic is that "recorded date [is a] proxy for the onset date," when onset date is not recorded.
I.e., Recorded Date is the First recorded date. If transferring a record from one system to another, the original Recorded Date should persist, if available.
The Recorder, however, is "Individual who recorded the record and takes responsibility for its content." If someone updates the record, that person is now the most knowledgeable, and should be the recorder.