Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US QI Core (FHIR)
-
2.0 [deprecated]
-
Clinical Quality Information
-
QICore Claim
-
QI-Core Profiles
-
-
Abdulah Rafiqi/Ben Hamlin 13-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Non-compatible
Description
When a top level element in a resource has cardinality 1.. (i.e., mandatory), it should be marked as MUST SUPPORT (MS). Review all QI-Core profiles and make sure MS is set for mandatory top level elements.
This is consistent with http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/conformance-expectations.html#mandatory-elements
QI-Core profiles that do not derive from US Core should be examined.
For example, Claim has .status, .type, .use, and .priority currently not marked as MS.
QI-Core profiles that derive from US Core are probably ok.
Do we need to also mark 2nd level 1.. elements as MS if it's parent element is MS (but not necessarily mandatory)?