Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-32561

Explain why modelNumner and partNumber aren't codes

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • R4
    • Orders & Observations
    • Device
    • Hide

      Proposed motion to place the following text in Section 8.14.4.2.1: "For systems that do have a system URI for device types (indicating the model number or part number), they can and should appear as codings in Device.type” 

      Show
      Proposed motion to place the following text in Section 8.14.4.2.1: "For systems that do have a system URI for device types (indicating the model number or part number), they can and should appear as codings in Device.type” 
    • Marti Velezis / Riki Merrick: 9-0-5
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive
    • R5

    Description

      Technically they can and should be, but presume they aren't because there won't be a 'system' URI. That should be explained. (For systems that do have a system URI for these concepts, they can and should appear as codings in Device.type

      (Comment 123 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            lloyd Lloyd McKenzie
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: