Details

    • Type: Change Request
    • Status: Published (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Specification:
      US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • Raised in Version:
      1.0.0
    • Work Group:
      Clinical Interoperability Council
    • Related Page(s):
      Identifying In-Scope Patients
    • Grouping:
    • Resolution Description:
      Hide

      Persuasive.  IG will Use the descriptive phrase 'in-scope' patient with an explanation, rather than jargonny mCode-patient.

      Show
      Persuasive.  IG will Use the descriptive phrase 'in-scope' patient with an explanation, rather than jargonny mCode-patient.
    • Resolution Vote:
      Sharita Alai/Jimmy Tcheng:11-0-0
    • Change Category:
      Clarification
    • Change Impact:
      Non-substantive

      Description

      It is not clear, why there is a need to use the term “mCODE patient”, if “In general, all patients with confirmed cancer diagnoses SHOULD be covered by mCODE”, use CancerPatient

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              mrocca Mitra Rocca
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Vote Date: