Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-32036

Should Observation.value be required?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • NHSN Inpatient Medication Administration (FHIR)
    • 0.1.0
    • Pharmacy
    • Observation - Laboratory SARS COVID-19
    • Hide

      We will not constrain this further - i.e. it will have the same constraints at the US Core Lab Results profile http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/StructureDefinition-us-core-observation-lab.html (the US Core profile states: "Each Observation must support a result value or a reason why the data is absent). Will filter out results at the NHSN end if needed.

      Show
      We will not constrain this further - i.e. it will have the same constraints at the US Core Lab Results profile http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/StructureDefinition-us-core-observation-lab.html (the US Core profile states: "Each Observation must support a result value or a reason why the data is absent). Will filter out results at the NHSN end if needed.
    • Sarah Gaunt / Tim McNeil : 7 - 0 - 2

    Description

      Is there a scenario where a COIVD Observation would be included in the Composition but would not have Observation.value[x] populated? Should .value be 1..1? Or are there scenarios where .dataAbsentReason can legitimately be populated instead?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            craig.newman Craig Newman
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: