-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
R4
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
Terminologies - Systems
Terminologies - Valuesets -
-
Rob Hausam/Reuben Daniels: 4-0-0
Improving the IG developer guidance for using HL7/FHIR-maintained CVX code systems and value sets is time-sensitive as this is related to vaccinations and there may be developers actively working on FHIR IGs that need to use CVX codes.
There are 3 HL7/FHIR-managed pages I've identified that I think should be updated to clarify what the recommended code system and value set is.
-----------
Item 1) https://terminology.hl7.org/2.1.0/ValueSet-v2-0292.html is out of date and should not be used. Currently there is a warning that reads:
Warning: this expansion is generated from a fragment of the code system PH_VaccinesAdministeredCVX_CDC_NIP and may be missing codes, or include codes that are not valid
I don't think this warning is strong or clear enough as this value set should never be used for new implementations. Could it be changed to something like the following?
Warning: This value set is no longer updated. New implementations should instead use X.
Except I'm not sure what X should be. I believe https://www2a.cdc.gov/vaccines/iis/iisstandards/vaccines.asp?rpt=cvx is the canonical source for the underlying code system, but this does not have a FHIR endpoint as far as I can tell.
-------------
Item 2) My understanding is that https://www.hl7.org/fhir/valueset-vaccine-code.html is also not kept up to date. Can a similar warning be added to this page?
-------------
Item 3) Can https://www.hl7.org/fhir/cvx.html be updated to indicate what URI should be used in FHIR IGs to refer to the CVX code system? (Is it still http://hl7.org/fhir/sid/cvx? Does this make sense if tx.fhir.org has an outdated version of the CVX code system that doesn't include any COVID-19 vaccines, which I believe is the current state?)
And can this page have an explanation added indicating what, if any best practice there is for a value set of active CVX codes? (Most implementations will likely only want to bind to the subset of active CVX rather than all of them, which needs a value set.)
My understanding is that the PHIN VADS versions of the CVX code system and value set are also not necessarily regularly updated. I believe the Vocab WG discussed this and may have more details though.
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...