Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
R4
-
Patient Administration
-
RelatedPerson
-
-
Sonja Ziegler / Iryna Roy : 3-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Non-compatible
-
R5
Description
There are many concepts in CDA and V2 that describe a relationship to a Patient or a role played by a person as an individual, who is not a practitioner. I think all there terms are going to need to become concepts in the relatedperson-relationshiptype value set. Two that we currently have a need for is Notary and Witness.
To support the Advance Directives Interoperability work, we need the terms Witness (WIT from http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ParticipationType); and we need the term NotaryPublic from RoleClassNotaryPublic (NOT from http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-RoleClassNotaryPublic) need to be addressed.
We can add these concepts to a separate value set, in our profile, but should the full set of preferred concepts be added to the preferred value set for the base FHIR resource?
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
FHIR-32230 RelatedPerson lists Guardian and Power of Attorney as use cases, but neither are in the value set
- Published