Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
R4
-
FHIR Infrastructure
-
CapabilityStatement (Conformance)
-
-
Josh Mandel/Rick Geimer: 15-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Compatible, substantive
Description
For the searchInclude documentation in a CapabilityStatement, they are expected to be the actual parameter values supported (i.e. "Coverage:payor") but for declaring support for the optional 3rd parameter (i.e. "Coverage:payor:Patient") would that whole value also be expected to be in the CapabilityStatement? or would the root Coverage:payor be enough to imply that optional parameter is also supported.
Clarification is needed on how to represent these include/revInclude values https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179166-implementers/topic/CapabilityStatement.20searchInclude.20documentation
Attachments
Issue Links
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...