Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-31613

Clarification on representing include/revInclude 3rd param in CapabilityStatement

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • R4
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • CapabilityStatement (Conformance)
    • Hide

      In CapabilityStatement2, we will:

      • ensure there's an ability to say that you support all (or none) of the Resource filters
      • make clear that declaring support for the non-resource qualified version does not imply support for the resource-qualified version
      • that servers that don't support the filtered version but do support the non-filtered version may choose to return either the non-filtered version or ignore the _include.  Whatever decision is made, what is returned SHALL be reflected in the 'self' link
      Show
      In CapabilityStatement2, we will: ensure there's an ability to say that you support all (or none) of the Resource filters make clear that declaring support for the non-resource qualified version does not imply support for the resource-qualified version that servers that don't support the filtered version but do support the non-filtered version may choose to return either the non-filtered version or ignore the _include.  Whatever decision is made, what is returned SHALL be reflected in the 'self' link
    • Josh Mandel/Rick Geimer: 15-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      For the searchInclude documentation in a CapabilityStatement, they are expected to be the actual parameter values supported (i.e. "Coverage:payor") but for declaring support for the optional 3rd parameter (i.e. "Coverage:payor:Patient") would that whole value also be expected to be in the CapabilityStatement? or would the root Coverage:payor be enough to imply that optional parameter is also supported.

      Clarification is needed on how to represent these include/revInclude values https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/179166-implementers/topic/CapabilityStatement.20searchInclude.20documentation

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            ryan_moehrke Ryan Moehrke
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: