Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-31207

Consent.performer and dateTime should be mandatory

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US SDOH Clinical Care (FHIR)
    • 0.1.0 [deprecated]
    • Patient Care
    • SDOHCC Consent
    • Hide

      Will add required support for datetime to allow the recipient to determine the "order" of multiple consents – there is no use case for having performer computable (e.g. required) since it will normally be present in the consent "form"  (add usage notes)

      Show
      Will add required support for datetime to allow the recipient to determine the "order" of multiple consents – there is no use case for having performer computable (e.g. required) since it will normally be present in the consent "form"  (add usage notes)
    • Bob Dieterle / Jay Lyle : 7-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Non-compatible

    Description

      Legally, you need to know who gave consent and when it was given. Subsequent statements can override earlier ones. Without a date, you don't know what's newer. Consent can be given on behalf of someone else - and it's important to know if that happened and who's responsible. Performer can't be inferred.

      (Comment 140 - imported by: Robert Dieterle)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            lloyd Lloyd McKenzie
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: