Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-30973

Can the requirement for case reporting before going to a PH be expressed more clearly in the eRSD.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • Electronic Case Reporting (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0
    • Public Health
    • (NA)
    • Requirements/narrative
    • Hide

      Will add guidance to PlanDefinition that some sort of secondary processing is needed - more clear language and ideally something computable to say "suspected reportable but needs further processing to make final determination of reportability"

      Show
      Will add guidance to PlanDefinition that some sort of secondary processing is needed - more clear language and ideally something computable to say "suspected reportable but needs further processing to make final determination of reportability"
    • Sarah Gaunt / AbdulMalik Shakir : 29 - 0 - 0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Not clear in eRSD requirement for case reporting that indicates that there is a need for secondary rules processing before going to a PH (implementers confused - think that once it's triggered it can go straight to the PHA) - can this be expressed more clearly in the eRSD
      Corollary: If there is a supplemental bundle with rules is there a way of automatically indicating that it should be employed?

      (Comment 73 - imported by: Jean Duteau)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            minigrrl Sarah Gaunt
            minigrrl Sarah Gaunt
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: