Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-29489

This should be pointing to the released version of the smart back-end Services authorization guide published on hl7.org.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Medication FHIR Implementation Guide (FHIR)
    • 1.2.0
    • Pharmacy
    • PDMP

    Description

      > In addition to the above, the PDMP transactions between the PDMP Requestor and the PDMP Responder need to be secured using the SMART Backend Services Authorization Guide as shown in Figure 6 below.

      This should be pointing to the released version of the smart back-end Services authorization guide published on hl7.org. It's worth considering whether implementers should be constrained to only using this guy, or whether this should be simply a recommended option. Is there real world application experience pushing this into production? If not, it would be good to leave options open and tighten over time.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            jmandel Josh Mandel
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: