Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-27249

A reference or clarification is needed

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 3.3.6
    • Hide

      An explanation about these I and NE flags will be added. The first is determined automatically if there are invariants affecting the element (the presence of an "obeys" rule), and the second is reserved for some infrastructural elements. If needed, however, both can be set using caret syntax.

      Show
      An explanation about these I and NE flags will be added. The first is determined automatically if there are invariants affecting the element (the presence of an "obeys" rule), and the second is reserved for some infrastructural elements. If needed, however, both can be set using caret syntax.
    • Kramer/Rhodes: 14-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      I think it is important to state that these flags should not be explicitly specified within FSH. clarify from which information this flags will be derived.

      Existing Wording:

      These are not supported by FSH, since they are derived from other information.

      Proposed Wording:

      These do not require explicit specification within FSH. For convenience, these flags are implicitly derived from other information according to the rules specified <hier>.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            ivan_zapreev Ivan Zapreev (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: