XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 3.3.5
    • Hide

      Closely allied to FHIR-27265, but not quite a duplicate. In the other issue, the pro and con arguments are laid out, and the proposed resolution is to accept both "|" and "or" in References. That resolution will resolve this issue.

      The decision was to change "|" to "or".

      Show
      Closely allied to FHIR-27265 , but not quite a duplicate. In the other issue, the pro and con arguments are laid out, and the proposed resolution is to accept both "|" and "or" in References. That resolution will resolve this issue. The decision was to change "|" to "or".
    • Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Non-compatible

    Description

      Why use a diffent representation here? Other parts in the spec use and and or as keywords, shouldn’t we do the same here?

      Existing Wording:

      Note: The vertical bar within references represents logical ‘or’.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            bvdh Bas van den Heuvel
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: