Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

JSON

Specification:

Shorthand (FHIR)
Raised in Version:

0.12.0 [deprecated]
Work Group:

FHIR Infrastructure
Related URL:
http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/shorthand/2020MAY/index.html#rules
Related Page(s):

Language Reference
Related Section(s):
1.3.4
Grouping:
- Block-Vote-4
Resolution Description:

Hide

Not part of the formal specification, but still a good suggestion. It will be rewritten as:

"Here are two examples of defining inline extensions, the first with a single extension, the second with multiple extensions:"

Show
Not part of the formal specification, but still a good suggestion. It will be rewritten as: "Here are two examples of defining inline extensions, the first with a single extension, the second with multiple extensions:"
Resolution Vote:
Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
Change Category:
Clarification
Change Impact:
Non-substantive

Please clarify in the text why two examples are needed and one is not enough. I do not see any significant sintactic differences between them.

Here are two examples of defining inline extensions: …

is voted on by

BALLOT-12402 Affirmative - Bas van den Heuvel : 2020-May-SHORTHAND R1 STU