Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-26202

clarify must support rules3

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Da Vinci Alerts (FHIR)
    • 0.2.0 [deprecated]
    • Infrastructure & Messaging
    • (many)
    • 2.1.6.1
    • Hide

      agree and will remove bullet from the must support section.
      as well as bullet for SHALL NOT in section below http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-alerts/guidance.html#graphdefinition

      Show
      agree and will remove bullet from the must support section. as well as bullet for SHALL NOT in section below http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-alerts/guidance.html#graphdefinition
    • Riki Merrick / Sandy Stuart: 3-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Not sure of the intent of this shall not-it seems that what the recipient "shall" do is decribed in the bullets above and below this bullet-if it could be combined with what "shall" be done to address the error-that may help although that may be what the other bullets address...

      Existing Wording:

      In situations where information on a particular data element is not present and the reason for absence is unknown, the Sender SHALL NOT include the data elements in the resource instance as part of a $process-message operation or a query response

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            klsalzman Keith Salzman
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: