Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-24710

Why are there no conformance statement on payers on this page? - DTR #56

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci DTR (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Financial Mgmt
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • 3.0
    • Hide

      We agree, please use the below sentance instead:

      "Payer systems SHALL use the specification and workflows defined by Clinical Quality Language (CQL) to facilitate Documentation Templates and Rules functionality within clinical systems."

      Show
      We agree, please use the below sentance instead: "Payer systems SHALL use the specification and workflows defined by Clinical Quality Language (CQL) to facilitate Documentation Templates and Rules functionality within clinical systems."
    • Larry Decelles / Isaac Vetter: 14-0-6
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Existing Wording: Clinical systems SHALL use the specification and workflows defined by Clinical Quality Language (CQL) to init

      Comment:

      This is crazy. The entire premise of DTR is that clinical needn't understand CQL, otherwise, there would be not DTR app. The entire point of the IG is that payer systems need to produce and the DTR app consumes and translate the CQL to the EHR. Why are there no conformance requirement on payers on this page?

      Summary:

      Why are there no conformance statement on payers on this page?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Isaac.Vetter Isaac Vetter
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: