Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-24502

TradeMark signs missing from several instances of mCODE mentions - MCODE #85

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • (NA)
    • Landing page
    • Hide

      "It is only necessary to use a symbol with the first instance of the mark, or with the most prominent placement of the mark. It is a common misconception that each and every instance of the mark should bear a trademark symbol. Overuse creates visual clutter and may detract from the aesthetic appeal of the piece. Provided there is at least one conspicuous use of the TM, SM, or ® on the face of the writing, do not be afraid to eliminate superfluous markings."

      See https://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2014/03/12/when-and-how-do-i-have-to-use-trademark-symbols/#11cf0c75c0af

      We propose to follow this advice, make sure there is one conspicuous us of TM, and elminate superfluous markings.

      Proposed resolution: Persuasive with mod.

      Show
      "It is only necessary to use a symbol with the first instance of the mark, or with the most prominent placement of the mark. It is a common misconception that each and every instance of the mark should bear a trademark symbol. Overuse creates visual clutter and may detract from the aesthetic appeal of the piece. Provided there is at least one conspicuous use of the TM, SM, or ® on the face of the writing, do not be afraid to eliminate superfluous markings." See  https://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2014/03/12/when-and-how-do-i-have-to-use-trademark-symbols/#11cf0c75c0af We propose to follow this advice, make sure there is one conspicuous us of TM, and elminate superfluous markings. Proposed resolution: Persuasive with mod.
    • Richard Esmond/Kurt Allen: 10-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Existing Wording: ...data requirements for mCODE…

      Comment:

      [Background] The first appearance of mCODE are associated with TradeMark signs , while the later appearances of mCODE are not. Please keep this in synch throughout the IG spec.

      Summary:

      TradeMark signs missing from several instances of mCODE mentions

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            may_terry May Terry
            mrocca Mitra Rocca
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: