Loading...

XML

Word

Printable

JSON

Details

Type: Change Request
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
Priority: Medium

Specification:

Structured Data Capture (SDC) (FHIR)
Raised in Version:

STU3
Work Group:

FHIR Infrastructure
Related URL:
http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/sdc/extraction.html#observation-based-extraction
Related Page(s):

(profiles) [deprecated]
Related Section(s):
11.3.1
Grouping:
- SDC
Resolution Description:

Hide

We think the logic is correct, however the expression is unclear.

Will change the order to list "take no action" first and make the "no change" bullet last within that section

Will change the "update" to say "all of the conditions above apply, with the exception that the value *has*changed.

I.e. Will stop repeating the 4 bullets that are unchanged to make things clearer

Show
We think the logic is correct, however the expression is unclear. Will change the order to list "take no action" first and make the "no change" bullet last within that section Will change the "update" to say "all of the conditions above apply, with the exception that the value *has*changed. I.e. Will stop repeating the 4 bullets that are unchanged to make things clearer
Resolution Vote:
Brian Postlethwaite/Paul Lynch: 6-0-0
Change Category:
Clarification
Change Impact:
Non-substantive

Description

Guidelines for updating an observation and doing nothing are all the same except for the fourth one. How can you decide to update or take no action if they have the same conditions?