Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Medium
-
US Quality Measures (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Clinical Quality Information
-
ImplementationGuide [deprecated]
-
-
Bryn Rhodes/Ben Hamlin: 16-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Non-substantive
Description
Is there a naming convention for "groups"? I didn't notice anything in the IG although saw something like "group-1" in an example. Should there be a convention? Could this be a spot for the measure developer name for a population set?
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-8744 Affirmative - Zachary May : 2019-May-FHIR IG QM R1
- Closed