Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-21177

Is there a naming convention for "groups"? I didn't notice anything in the IG although saw something like "group-1" in an example. Should there be a convention? Could this be a spot for the measure developer name for a population set?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Quality Measures (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • ImplementationGuide [deprecated]
    • Hide

      Agreed, add conformance requirement that groups SHOULD be identified according to the convention:

      "group-<group number>"

      Where <group number> corresponds with the group naming convention for the criteria within the group.

      Show
      Agreed, add conformance requirement that groups SHOULD be identified according to the convention: "group-<group number>" Where <group number> corresponds with the group naming convention for the criteria within the group.
    • Bryn Rhodes/Ben Hamlin: 16-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Is there a naming convention for "groups"? I didn't notice anything in the IG although saw something like "group-1" in an example. Should there be a convention? Could this be a spot for the measure developer name for a population set?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            lizzie_charbonneau Lizzie Charbonneau
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: