Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-20699

Additional metadata for mesaure report | quality statement

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • MeasureReport
    • Hide

      Suggest that the following extensions be defined in the Quality Measure IG, similar to:

      [Allocation](http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cqf-measures/StructureDefinition-cqfm-allocation.html)

       

      limitations: 0..1 identifies what limitations should be noted, including potential selection biases and confounding factors when interpreting indicator results or comparing results across the country.

      trendingIssues: 0..1 identifies what issues might affect the interpretation of trending results, including changes in geographic coverage, data quality, coding standards and classification changes (for example, a new ICD standard).

      Note that the existing [Comment](http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cqf-measures/StructureDefinition-cqfm-artifactComment.html) extension already provides a mechanism for comments.

      Once defined in the QM IG, we will promote these as extensions to the base specification.

      Show
      Suggest that the following extensions be defined in the Quality Measure IG, similar to: [Allocation] ( http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cqf-measures/StructureDefinition-cqfm-allocation.html)   limitations: 0..1 identifies what limitations should be noted, including potential selection biases and confounding factors when interpreting indicator results or comparing results across the country. trendingIssues: 0..1 identifies what issues might affect the interpretation of trending results, including changes in geographic coverage, data quality, coding standards and classification changes (for example, a new ICD standard). Note that the existing [Comment] ( http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/cqf-measures/StructureDefinition-cqfm-artifactComment.html) extension already provides a mechanism for comments. Once defined in the QM IG, we will promote these as extensions to the base specification.
    • Floyd Eisenberg/Bryn Rhodes: 28-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      Request support for additional metadata related to quality statement of the report:

      1) Caveats and limitations (i.e. identifies what limitations should be noted, including potential selection biases and confounding factors when interpreting indicator results or comparing results across the country).

      2) Trending issues (i.e. identifies what issues might affect the interpretation of trending results, including changes in geographic coverage, data quality, coding standards and classification changes (for example, a new ICD standard)).

      3) Comments (i.e. provides any other comments necessary to interpret the indicator not captured in other attributes. Also includes any future methodological updates).

      Thanks.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            fflores Finnie Flores (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: