Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-10644

Is-modifier section doesn't specify which element is being discussed in the example

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Conformance Rules
    • Hide

      Proposed resolution: Persuasive

      Show
      Proposed resolution: Persuasive
    • Grahame Grieve/Josh Mandel: 8-0-3
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU2

    Description

      The Is-modifier section could be clarified if the sentence below indicated which element (i.e. status) was being discussed. I recommend changing:

      FROM: The value of element affects the entire meaning of the resource - if it is set to refuted, the entire resource must be understood differently, and so it is not safe for implementations to ignore it

      TO: The value of the status element affects the entire meaning of the resource - if it is set to refuted, the entire resource must be understood differently, and so it is not safe for implementations to ignore it

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            michelle.m.miller Michelle Miller
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: