Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
C-CDA Templates Clinical Notes (CDA)
-
3.0.0-ballot
-
Structured Documents
-
STU
-
Policy Activity
-
-
Jean D / Brett M : 12-0-0
-
Correction
-
Compatible, substantive
Description
I wish I'd noticed this a few months ago, but I missed the 2023-10-19 call where we apparently voted on CDA-20771. I think representing the period a policy is active using the policy's effectiveTime is all well and good on its own... except the Policy Activity template currently does call out that a covered participant SHOULD have [0..1] time.
If we're adding an effectiveTime to represent the coverage dates, what are we doing with the participant's time? Do they both mean the same thing? We should at a minimum have some guidance for the participant/time explaining what's up with it.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-58143 Negative - Christopher Schaut : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61736 Negative - Vassil Peytchev : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61759 Negative - Daniel Rutz : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61780 Negative - Danielle Friend : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61801 Negative - David Sundaram-Stukel : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61823 Negative - Kimberly Herman : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61844 Negative - Cooper Thompson : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61945 Negative - Amit Popat : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-61968 Negative - Chris Courville : 2024-Jan-CDAR2 IG CCDA CLINNOTES E1 STU
- Balloted