Uploaded image for project: 'CDA Specification Feedback'
  1. CDA Specification Feedback
  2. CDA-20494

Pharmacist Consultation Note doesn't accurately reference C-CDA elements

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • Pharmacy Templates (CDA)
    • 1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Pharmacy
    • STU
    • Templates
    • Hide

      This issue pertains to Pharmacist Consultation Note (OTHER) and has been replicated there for resolution

      We are administratively rejecting this issue.

      Show
      This issue pertains to Pharmacist Consultation Note (OTHER) and has been replicated there for resolution We are administratively rejecting this issue.
    • Scott Robertson / Shelly Spiro: 9-0-0

      The Pharmacist Consult Note template claims that the C-CDA ClinicalDocument column in the template requirements table represents:

      The XML element within the ClinicalDocument where the described information is located. 
      “---” indicates that the concept does not pertain to the C-CDA structure. Either the concept doesn’t apply or the concept 
      is incorporated differently than how it is incorporated in C-CDA
      “ClinicalDocument” is the XML root element of a Pharmacist Consultation Note.

      However, it then contains values such as "ID", "Address," "Telecommunication," "Name," and "Gender", none of which are elements in the C-CDA document (instead they'd be id, addr, telecom, name, and administrativeGenderCode).

      IMO, this is a good argument for using standard tooling for these templates (ART-DECOR or, better yet, Trifolia); this would become a lot more standard and easier to maintain.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            mszczepa Matt Szczepankiewicz
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: