Specification - Extended HL7 CDA® R2 IG: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes DSTU Release 2.1 - US Realm
Document Description extended per extended per TSC tracker 12437, again with 14128 and jira.hl7.org/browse/TSC-38
Existing WordingThe US Realm Header for Patient Generated Document (V2) template contains the following free-text constraints: The functionCode SHALL be selected from value set ParticipationType 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.10901 When indicating the performer was the primary care physician the functionCode shall be =”PCP”
Proposed WordingWhy aren't these actual conformance statements? The first one is computable, and even though the second one isn't, can't it still be written as a free-text conformance statement in Trifolia with a CONF: number and everything rather than just hiding in the free-text guidance?