Uploaded image for project: 'CDA Specification Feedback'
  1. CDA Specification Feedback
  2. CDA-2028

STU-2028 - Outcome Observation - bad conformance statement leads to no schematron testing

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest

    Description

      Specification - Extended

      HL7 CDA® R2 IG: C-CDA Templates for Clinical Notes DSTU Release 2.1 - US Realm

       Document Description

      extended per extended per TSC tracker 12437, again with 14128 and jira.hl7.org/browse/TSC-38 

      Existing Wording

      Outcome Observation (urn:oid:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.144): Typo (should be entryRelationship): 12. SHALL contain at least one [1..*] entryRelationships (CONF:1098-32782). Note that this isn't tested in the schematron either, presumably because it was looking for an "entryRelationships" element. We should fix this in Trifolia and I think (hope?) that'll give us the schematron fix for free.

      Proposed Wording

      12. SHALL contain at least one [1..*] entryRelationship (CONF:1098-32782).

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            mszczepa Matt Szczepankiewicz
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: