Uploaded image for project: 'V2 Specification Feedback'
  1. V2 Specification Feedback
  2. V2-25440

There are too many of these gender/sex data elements, with vague and unclear description and usage.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Question Question
    • Resolution: Considered - Question answered
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • V2.x Message Specification (V2)
    • V2.9
    • Infrastructure & Messaging
    • Control (Chapter 2)
    • v291_CH02C_Tables_2022SEP_nomarkup.pdfPage 21
    • Hide

      V2 Management (1/13/2023) :

      "Administrative Sex" - this is the historical field - is widely implemented and we are recommending it no longer be used and rpelaced with the more precise data elements:

      "Gender Identity"

      "Recorded Sex or Gender Type"

      "International Equivalent Sex Value"

      "Sex for Clinical Use"

      These two were unfortunate names that represented something different and these will be renamed as identified in other jiras:

      "Document Gender Type" - this is describing the document type from which the Recorded Sex or Gender value was recorded - will be named: Source Document Type For Recorded Sex Or Gender (per V2-25439)

      "Jurisdiction Gender" is describing the applicable jusridiction of the source document - it should probalby also be renamed to "Source Document Jurisdiction"
       

      Show
      V2 Management (1/13/2023) : "Administrative Sex" - this is the historical field - is widely implemented and we are recommending it no longer be used and rpelaced with the more precise data elements: "Gender Identity" "Recorded Sex or Gender Type" "International Equivalent Sex Value" "Sex for Clinical Use" These two were unfortunate names that represented something different and these will be renamed as identified in other jiras: "Document Gender Type" - this is describing the document type from which the Recorded Sex or Gender value was recorded - will be named: Source Document Type For Recorded Sex Or Gender (per V2-25439 ) "Jurisdiction Gender" is describing the applicable jusridiction of the source document - it should probalby also be renamed to "Source Document Jurisdiction"  

    Description

      "Administrative Sex" "Gender Identity", "Recorded Sex or Gender Type", International Equivalent Sex Value", "Document Gender Type", "Jurisdiction Gender", "Sex for Clinical Use"   *** There are too many of these gender/sex data elements, with vague and unclear description and usage. This is creating more issues and complexity than solving the actual problem.

      (Comment 21 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: