Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
V2.x Message Specification (V2)
-
V2.9
-
Patient Administration
-
Control (Chapter 2)
-
CH02C_Tables_2022SEP_nomarkup PDF, Table 0828 on page 788
-
-
Riki Merrick / Brian Postlethwaite : 4-0-2
-
Enhancement
-
Compatible, substantive
Description
Some SGWG members felt sex for clinical use and its value sets are discriminatory that promotes cisnormativity, so we propose to vote NEGATIVE for this section As an alternative, we suggest to change the label to Parameters for clinical use and separate it from Sex altogether, since other non-sex related clinical conditions may require special/specific considerations as well. Another suggestion is to use Organ inventory with a defined value set to remove having to make assumptions about sex status altogether.
(Comment 8 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-42019 Negative - Ron G. Parker : 2022-Sep-V291 R1 Norm
- Closed
-
BALLOT-42231 Negative - Joan Harper : 2022-Sep-V291 R1 Norm
- Closed
-
BALLOT-42267 Negative - Sheridan Cook : 2022-Sep-V291 R1 Norm
- Closed
-
BALLOT-42303 Negative - Ken Sinn : 2022-Sep-V291 R1 Norm
- Closed
- relates to
-
OTHER-2671 In CDA, change SFCU to SPCU based upon resolution of ballot comments
- Published
-
OTHER-2631 Is it possible to change the term Sex for Clinical Use to something that does not contain the word "Sex".
- Resolved - No Change
-
FHIR-39219 Data element is discriminatory
- Published
-
OTHER-2671 In CDA, change SFCU to SPCU based upon resolution of ballot comments
- Published