Uploaded image for project: 'V2 Specification Feedback'
  1. V2 Specification Feedback
  2. V2-25391

Clarify definition for SPM-1

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Considered for Future Use
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • V2.x Message Specification (V2)
    • V2.9
    • Orders & Observations
    • Specimen (SPM)
    • Observations (Chapter 7)
    • 7.4.3.1
    • Hide

      Motion to defer the following consideration:

       

      Add this sentence to the existing definition:

      Implementation Guide authors SHALL clarify if the value of SPM-1 (Set ID – SPM) starts at ‘0' or '1’ and define if sequential increments reset within a message when a new group they are part of starts.

      Show
      Motion to defer the following consideration:   Add this sentence to the existing definition: Implementation Guide authors SHALL clarify if the value of SPM-1 (Set ID – SPM) starts at ‘0' or '1’ and define if sequential increments reset within a message when a new group they are part of starts.
    • Craig Newman / Ralf Herzog : 11-0-0

    Description

      I am creating a separate issue from V2-25342 so that we can assign it to OO.

      We should either clarify the numbering scheme for Set ID values as to whether numbering SHOULD start with 0 or 1 and whether numbering SHOULD restart with each segment group, or explicitly defer that down to Implementation Guides as per V2-25381.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            nradov Nick Radov
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: