Uploaded image for project: 'Other Specification Feedback'
  1. Other Specification Feedback
  2. OTHER-2614

Consider allowing gender harmony extensions on PractitionerRole

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Highest Highest

    Description

      Statements elsewhere in this IG indicate that patients may have preferred gender identities, pronouns, or recorded sex/gender depending on context (clinical vs. work). It is not hard to extrapolate that some practitioners may want to express different gender identities in some work contexts compared to others. Please reconsider allowing these extensions on PractitionerRole, or allowing an indication of work context for the extensions on Practitioner

      Existing Wording:

      It is not included on PracitionerRole, as PractitionerRole refers to Practitioner for demographics. (multiple locations)

      (Comment 56 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated: