Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
-
1.0.0-ballot
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
Model
-
3.2.3
-
-
Carol Macumber / MaryKay McDaniel : 5-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
Existing wording is clunky and may suggest copying patient-level SFCU to each observation. I think the intent of this statement is that a SFCU assertion at the patient level is assumed to cover all observations (within the validity period) unless an observation-specific SFCU assertion exists. Tighten up existing wording.
Existing Wording:
The expectation is that the patient level SFCU is the default value used in all observations in a report and have an individual SFCU for individual observations when that observation was performed using a different SFCU.
(Comment 23 - imported by: Lloyd McKenzie)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-44001 Affirmative - Ron G. Parker : 2022-Sep-HL7 IG SEX GENDER R1 STU
- Balloted