Uploaded image for project: 'Other Specification Feedback'
  1. Other Specification Feedback
  2. OTHER-2556

The design for Gender Identity and its corresponding value set should explicit support the notion of 'prefer not to answer'

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • Cross Paradigm Gender Harmony - Sex and Gender Representation (OTHER)
    • 1.0.0-ballot
    • Terminology Infrastructure
    • Gender Identity terminology (GI) [deprecated]
    • Hide

      We are using the Gender Harmony valueset for all product families. Use this in the value set row.

      In the support unknown row, use the following in all:
      UNK - Unknown is in the value set. Asked-decline is in the gender identity value set.

      Show
      We are using the Gender Harmony valueset for all product families. Use this in the value set row. In the support unknown row, use the following in all: UNK - Unknown is in the value set. Asked-decline is in the gender identity value set.
    • Joanie H/Carol M:8-0-3
    • Correction
    • Compatible, substantive

      The Gender Identity element's design should consider supporting prefer not to answer as a permissible value and thus also include this value in the defined Gender Identity [value set|http://hl7.org/fhir/2022Sep/valueset-gender-identity.html.]

       

      Australian federal and state government data standards all support prefer not to answer as a permissible value.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            reuben.daniels Reuben Daniels
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: