Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
US C-CDA on FHIR (FHIR)
-
1.2.0-ballot
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
STU
-
FHIR Data Absent Reason to C-CDA NullFlavor
-
-
Jay Lyle/John D'Amore: 18-0-6
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
I know there's generic recommendation to use FHIR's "unknown" in the absence of otherwise required information, but it feels completely wrong that FHIR's "unknown" would not just directly map to CDA's "UNK" nullFlavor.
Other mappings I'd suggest additional discussion on:
- unsupported - seems more like "not applicable" than "no information"
- not-permitted - also seems like "not applicable"
- error - does not seem like it should map to anything; though perhaps NAV or UNK
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-49124 Negative - Benjamin Flessner : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-49380 Negative - Gay Dolin : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-49497 Negative - Mike Paetz : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-49548 Negative - Nick Hatt : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted
-
BALLOT-49608 Negative - Matthew Moore : 2023-May-FHIR IG CCDA R1 STU
- Balloted