We will create a new HealthcareService profile aligned with rather than derived from the HealthcareService profile with Plannet (Copy and paste current constraints via fish) We will apply example bindings to type and category using current plan net value sets We will document "best approach" for terminology usage (per comments) We will not leverage open eligibility or LA 211 in bindings   Factors No option for abstract profile - base profile has extensible Long term terminology out look is in flux (See comments)   We will update the HealthcareService category and type bindings to be extensible. We will create two value set - one for category and one for type based on Open Eligibilty We will bind to category and type using grouping value set. Factors Example bindings are not proper to apply to existing extensible bindings within FHIR Example binding by their nature according to FHIR experts are not conducive to semantic interoperability Open Eligibility is open source code system with creative commons licensing acceptable by HL7 and THO Unfortunately, LA 211 code system is not available due to business factors beyond our control While numerous options have been investigated, this solution is the recommend approach by the project industry sponsor - Administrative Community of Living (ACL)