Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-40178

Should Past or Present Occupation Observation.code.coding be 1..1 instead of 1..*?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Core (FHIR)
    • 6.0.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Cross-Group Projects
    • US Core Observation Occupation Profile
    • 13.129.1.2
    • Hide

      CodeableConcept allows for multiple codings.  The defined pattern requires at least one coding must be the LOINC 11341-5.

      Will add the Profile specific implementation guidance in the introduction to clarify:

       

      • Additional codes that translate or map to the Observation code or category codes are allowed. For example:
        • providing both a local code and LOINC code
        • providing a more specific code, a SNOMED CT concept, or a system-specific code.

       

      Show
      CodeableConcept allows for multiple codings.  The defined pattern requires at least one coding must be the LOINC 11341-5. Will add the Profile specific implementation guidance in the introduction to clarify:   Additional codes that translate or map to the Observation code or category codes are allowed. For example: providing both a local code and LOINC code providing a more specific code, a SNOMED CT concept, or a system-specific code.  
    • Eric Haas/Brett Marquard: 21-0-2
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      It seems like the observation.code should be 1..1 instead of 1..* in this profile, since only 1 code is permissible.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            genny_luensman Genevieve Luensman
            Genevieve Luensman, Lori Fourquet
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: