Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-39761

Revise the introduction page

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Low Low
    • Electronic Medicinal Product Information (FHIR)
    • 1.0.0-ballot
    • Biomedical Research & Regulation
    • STU
    • Home
    • Hide
      • proceed as requested
      • remove the sentence "This guide will be reviewed annually for active use, obsolescence, and potential need for change."
      • add qualifications for Co-Lead and Technical co-lead roles in § 1.8
      Show
      proceed as requested remove the sentence "This guide will be reviewed annually for active use, obsolescence, and potential need for change." add qualifications for Co-Lead and Technical co-lead roles in § 1.8
    • Craig Anderson / Norman Gregory : 7-0-0
    • Correction
    • Non-substantive
    • 1.0.0-ballot

    Description

      • remove the sentence "FHIR resources: List Bundle Composition Organization Regulated Authorization Medicinal Product Definition Administrable Product Definition Manufactured Item Definition Ingredient Substance Definition Packaged Product Definition Clinical Use Definition Binary" (no added value in this list)
      • change "to be a common starting point to build region specific profiles"
        into
        "to be a common starting (Base ePI Profile + link to the 1.5.1 section) point to build region or country specific profiles (Regional or National ePI Profile + link to the 1.5.2 section)"
      • Remove "The national FHIR ePI profiles were defined by representatives from the health authority for the corresponding jurisdiction, representatives from Gravitate Health, and HL7's Vulcan Accelerator. On behalf of the international community and health authorities, this guide is maintained by HL7's Biomedical Research and Regulation (BR&R) Working Group" there are no national / regional profiles in this guide
      • revise or remove the sentence "This guide will be reviewed annually for active use, obsolescence, and potential need for change."
        Not sure that an annual review is what we should look for. Should we wait one year if an errata should be published ? 
      • Clarify the Co-Lead and Technical Lead roles in § 1.8 (lead of what ?)
      • fix Technical Leads (Technical Lead)
      • Tech Lead or Tech co-lead ?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            giorgio Giorgio Cangioli
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: