Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-39212

Would it be worthwhile to explicity say that values other than those in the Adminstrative Gender value set will be allowed?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • R5
    • Patient Administration
    • Extension Registry
    • Hide

      An "example" binding, by definition implies that values other than those in the bound value set are allowed.  While we do understand that not all readers of the spec are familiar with the definition of the example binding strength, there is a hyperlink to the definition directly in the spec.

       

      We did explore whether publishing changes could be made across the entire FHIR spec to make example bindings more comprehensible to casual readers, but due to R5 timelines, it wasn't something we could do.  That may be something that can happen in the future.

      Show
      An "example" binding, by definition implies that values other than those in the bound value set are allowed.  While we do understand that not all readers of the spec are familiar with the definition of the example binding strength, there is a hyperlink to the definition directly in the spec.   We did explore whether publishing changes could be made across the entire FHIR spec to make example bindings more comprehensible to casual readers, but due to R5 timelines, it wasn't something we could do.  That may be something that can happen in the future.
    • Rob McClure / Brian Postlethwaite : 8-0-2

    Description

      The value is binding to Administrative Gender as an example value set. Would it be worthwhile to explicity say that values other than those in the Adminstrative Gender value set will be allowed?

      (Comment 20 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: