Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
R5
-
Patient Administration
-
Terminologies - Systems
-
-
Rob McClure / Brian Postlethwaite : 8-0-2
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
-
R5
Description
Since "specified" may also be undefined, it seems similar to "unknown". The definition for "specified" in Table 0828 of the v2.9..1 specification is clearer.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-41617 Affirmative - Steven Nichols : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-43874 Affirmative - Mahesh Shinde : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-43958 Affirmative - Tamas Varjas : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-43960 Affirmative - Bill Felski : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-43962 Affirmative - Charlie Andrew : 2022-Sep-FHIR R5 STU
- Closed
- relates to
-
FHIR-39231 It isn't clear why a new unknown element is included in the Sex for Clinical Use code system rather than using unknown from the null flavours.
- Published
-
FHIR-39241 SFCU value set includes "Specified". This is meaningless. We need a meaningful value as alternative to male, female and inknown.
- Published
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...