Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-38808

Add support for imaging identifiers

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Core (FHIR)
    • 5.0.1
    • Cross-Group Projects
    • US Core DiagnosticReport Profile for Report and Note Exchange
      US Core ServiceRequest Profile
    • 12.119.1.1
    • Hide

      We acknowledge the existing issues with imaging reports and recognize the importance of improving access for patients and providers. We have considered splitting the diagnostic report into three profiles, as outlined in the notes here (https://hackmd.io/A910efYVTfmvstytxfN0Vg?view) and here (https://hackmd.io/92OJ5a4jRaG634NQnQ81JA?view).  

      The Argonaut SMART Imaging Access project is currently underway and is addressing many of the concerns raised by the commenter. The outcomes of this project may inform future updates to US Core. Thus, while we recognize the need for improvements in accessing imaging reports, a more cautious and considered approach is necessary at this time.

      To address the concerns raised, we will update guidance for accessing imaging studies in the US Core DiagnosticReport Profile for Report and Note Exchange Profile-specific implementation guidance:

      From

      • Diagnostic imaging results in visual images requiring interpretation and clinical test results/reports may also reference images as part of the report. The DiagnosticReport resource links to both Media which represents a specific kind of Observation whose value is image data and ImagingStudy which represents the content in a DICOM imaging study.
        • Only Media is marked as must support in this profile
        • The imagingStudy element MAY be used by systems to reference ImagingStudy. However, it is not supported by the majority of systems and its inclusion would be an unnecessary barrier to adoption.

      To

      • Diagnostic imaging results in visual images requiring interpretation and clinical test results/reports may also reference images as part of the report. There is no single approach for accessing imaging studies alongside clinical data using a single authorization flow to give patients and providers better access the images.
        • The 'media.link' element is marked as must support, and the Media resource to which it links can support a variety of patient-friendly content such as jpg images of xrays.  (see the DiagnosticReport Chest Xray Report Example)
        • The optional 'imagingStudy' element  references DICOM study instance, series, and SOP instances  UUID  encoded in the ImagingStudy resource as identifiers. It MAY be used by systems with the right tools and specific viewers for their providers.
        • Alternatively, systems can use business identifiers such as accession numbers in the 'identifer'  element to access the source images from external sources.
        • However, it is not supported by the majority of systems and its inclusion would be an unnecessary barrier to adoption.

       

       

      Show
      We acknowledge the existing issues with imaging reports and recognize the importance of improving access for patients and providers. We have considered splitting the diagnostic report into three profiles, as outlined in the notes here ( https://hackmd.io/A910efYVTfmvstytxfN0Vg?view ) and here ( https://hackmd.io/92OJ5a4jRaG634NQnQ81JA?view ).   The Argonaut SMART Imaging Access  project is currently underway and is addressing many of the concerns raised by the commenter. The outcomes of this project may inform future updates to US Core. Thus, while we recognize the need for improvements in accessing imaging reports, a more cautious and considered approach is necessary at this time. To address the concerns raised, we will update guidance for accessing imaging studies in the US Core DiagnosticReport Profile for Report and Note Exchange Profile-specific implementation guidance: From Diagnostic imaging results in visual images requiring interpretation and clinical test results/reports may also reference images as part of the report. The DiagnosticReport resource links to both  Media  which represents a specific kind of Observation whose value is image data and  ImagingStudy  which represents the content in a DICOM imaging study. Only Media is marked as must support in this profile The imagingStudy element  MAY  be used by systems to reference ImagingStudy. However, it is not supported by the majority of systems and its inclusion would be an unnecessary barrier to adoption. To Diagnostic imaging results in visual images requiring interpretation and clinical test results/reports may also reference images as part of the report. There is no single approach for accessing imaging studies alongside clinical data using a single authorization flow to give patients and providers better access the images. The 'media.link' element is marked as must support, and the Media resource to   which it links can support a variety of patient-friendly content such as jpg images of xrays.  (see the DiagnosticReport Chest Xray Report Example) The optional 'imagingStudy' element  references DICOM study instance , s eries, and SOP instances  UUID   encoded in the ImagingStudy resource as identifiers. It MAY be used by systems with the right tools and specific viewers for their providers. Alternatively, systems can use business identifiers such as accession numbers in the 'identifer'  element to access the source images from external sources. However, it is not supported by the majority of systems and its inclusion would be an unnecessary barrier to adoption.    
    • Eric Haas/Didi Davis: 14-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      A use case that US core currently does not support and it should, relates to applications that use diagnostic imaging.

      When such application is launched from an EHR, it will retrieve the patient’s diagnostic imaging related information. Based on this information, it wants to retrieve the information corresponding to the diagnostic images. US core provides support for Diagnostic Imaging using the US Core Observation Imaging Result Profile }}and{{{} US Core DiagnosticReport Profile for Report and Note Exchange.

      These profiles provide access to the results of the clinical imaging exam (order, observations and report) but all links to the source of the information are lost. This makes it hard if not impossible to link information retrieved through US core to the source imaging data and/or to cross link the information in US core to other data sources referring to the same imaging studies.

      Such linkage requires access to the corresponding DICOM identifiers, more specifically the DICOM Accession Number (tag (0008,0050)) which defines the order and the DICOM Study ID (tag (0020,0010)) with defines an image (set).

      FHIR provides guidance to where these identifiers are to be included in the FHIR resources. The Accession Number is provided as an identifier on a Diagnostic Imaging related ServiceRequest and as an identifier reference from ImagingStudy (see https://hl7.org/fhir/imagingstudy.html#notes). The Study ID is provided as an identifier on the ImagingStudy resource. But US core has not adopted it.

      US core defines requirements related to imaging related reports in US core is described in section 12.119.1.1 (http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/StructureDefinition-us-core-diagnosticreport-note.html#mandatory-and-must-support-data-elements). There is no section in the spec that specifies requirements related the imaging specific ServiceRequests (beyond category)

      We propose that US core recognizes this need and provides further guidance on how to handle imaging related orders and reports. Specifically how to include to the DICOM identifiers.

      Specifically, we propose to:

      1. add a Diagnostic Imaging ServiceRequest profile that includes the Accession Number identifier as an optional element; responders SHOULD include the information if available
      2. add a Media profile that includes the Study ID identifier as an optional element; responders SHOULD include the information if available.
      3. indicate that in the case ImagingStudy resources are provided, responders SHOULD include the Study ID identifier if this information if available.

       

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            bvdh Bas van den Heuvel
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: