Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
US Core (FHIR)
-
5.0.1
-
Cross-Group Projects
-
US Core DiagnosticReport Profile for Report and Note Exchange
US Core ServiceRequest Profile -
12.119.1.1
-
-
Eric Haas/Didi Davis: 14-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
A use case that US core currently does not support and it should, relates to applications that use diagnostic imaging.
When such application is launched from an EHR, it will retrieve the patient’s diagnostic imaging related information. Based on this information, it wants to retrieve the information corresponding to the diagnostic images. US core provides support for Diagnostic Imaging using the US Core Observation Imaging Result Profile }}and{{{} US Core DiagnosticReport Profile for Report and Note Exchange.
These profiles provide access to the results of the clinical imaging exam (order, observations and report) but all links to the source of the information are lost. This makes it hard if not impossible to link information retrieved through US core to the source imaging data and/or to cross link the information in US core to other data sources referring to the same imaging studies.
Such linkage requires access to the corresponding DICOM identifiers, more specifically the DICOM Accession Number (tag (0008,0050)) which defines the order and the DICOM Study ID (tag (0020,0010)) with defines an image (set).
FHIR provides guidance to where these identifiers are to be included in the FHIR resources. The Accession Number is provided as an identifier on a Diagnostic Imaging related ServiceRequest and as an identifier reference from ImagingStudy (see https://hl7.org/fhir/imagingstudy.html#notes). The Study ID is provided as an identifier on the ImagingStudy resource. But US core has not adopted it.
US core defines requirements related to imaging related reports in US core is described in section 12.119.1.1 (http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/StructureDefinition-us-core-diagnosticreport-note.html#mandatory-and-must-support-data-elements). There is no section in the spec that specifies requirements related the imaging specific ServiceRequests (beyond category)
We propose that US core recognizes this need and provides further guidance on how to handle imaging related orders and reports. Specifically how to include to the DICOM identifiers.
Specifically, we propose to:
- add a Diagnostic Imaging ServiceRequest profile that includes the Accession Number identifier as an optional element; responders SHOULD include the information if available
- add a Media profile that includes the Study ID identifier as an optional element; responders SHOULD include the information if available.
- indicate that in the case ImagingStudy resources are provided, responders SHOULD include the Study ID identifier if this information if available.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
FHIR-40514 US core should have specific profiles for imaging and lab results
- Published