Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Medium
-
US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
-
2.0.0-ballot
-
Patient Care
-
STU
-
Artifacts Summary
-
-
Eric Haas/Jay Lyle: 7-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
Throughout the guide both claim attachments and prior auth attachments are described without much conformance language around them, and the capability statements don't seem to differentiate which need to be supported.
If we're gearing up this IG as something an attachments rule could point at, we should clarify that prior auth attachments are the thing that must be supported, and claim attachments are optional (since prior auth has a set of FHIR IGs that may be regulated, and claims do not).
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-39476 Negative - Christopher Schaut : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40526 Negative - Amit Popat : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40549 Negative - Kimberly Herman : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40572 Negative - Daniel Rutz : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40579 Negative - David Sundaram-Stukel : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40586 Negative - Cooper Thompson : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40593 Negative - Chris Courville : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40610 Negative - Daniel Zhang : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn
-
BALLOT-40617 Negative - Isaac Vetter : 2022-Sep-FHIR IG CDex R1 STU
- Withdrawn