XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
    • 1.2.0-ballot [deprecated]
    • Financial Mgmt
    • Formal Specification
    • 5.1, 5.2.6, 5.2.7.1
    • Hide

      Agreed that we should define 278i and other common references to the 278 specifications in paragraph 5.2.6.

      Show
      Agreed that we should define 278i and other common references to the 278 specifications in paragraph 5.2.6.
    • Bob Dieterle / Jeff Brown : 8-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      No where in section 5 do we define what a '278i' is.

      278i is used in the diagram at 5.2 (and seems to be clear what it is)
      In 5.2.6 Prior Authorization Inquiry - we don't 'mention' a 278i
      but in 5.2.7.1 we state, " The intermediary SHOULD execute a 278i to return the status."

      Suggest in 5.2.6 (last paragraph) we add (278i Request) and (278i Response):
      The information in the Bundle is mapped to a 278 Health Care Services Review Information - Inquiry transaction (278i Request). The 278 Health Care Services Review Information - Response (278i Response) is then mapped to a PAS Inquiry Response Bundle with the results of the inquiry contained in the Bundle.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            mkmcdaniel Mary Kay McDaniel
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: