Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-35100

ServiceRequest.statusReason is not bound to a value set yet it is an extension added for use by QI Core

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Medium
    • US QI Core (FHIR)
    • current
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • QICore ServiceRequest
    • QI-Core Profiles
    • D.4.1.1
    • Hide

      Agree statusReason extension does not make sense in QI-Core ServiceRequest since it is not used in ServiceNotRequested. Removed from QI-Core ServiceRequest in FHIR-37447 for next ballot.

      Show
      Agree statusReason extension does not make sense in QI-Core ServiceRequest since it is not used in ServiceNotRequested. Removed from QI-Core ServiceRequest in FHIR-37447 for next ballot.
    • Abdulah Rafiqi/Ben Hamlin 13-0-0
    • Correction
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      statusReason is an extension from base FHIR but if it is important to QI Core it seems like there should be a code system attached and not just "unbounded" as inherited from base FHIR.

       

      A specific valueSet would be necessary if you were to base a quality measure on this element.

       

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              feisenberg Floyd Eisenberg
              lmichaelsen Linda Michaelsen
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: