Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-32880

Radiotherapy Volume - non-overlapping? (Christodouleas)

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Question
    • Status: Triaged (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Considered - Question answered
    • Specification:
      US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • Raised in Version:
      current
    • Work Group:
      Clinical Interoperability Council
    • Related Artifact(s):
      Radiotherapy Volume Profile
    • Resolution Description:
      Hide

      "radiotherapy volume" does not serve as a link between a summary and each phase.
      You can think of phases as part of the volume, using this partOf relationship. The radiotherapy volumes don't link the two volumes 

      Show
      "radiotherapy volume" does not serve as a link between a summary and each phase. You can think of phases as part of the volume, using this partOf relationship. The radiotherapy volumes don't link the two volumes 

      Description

      Submitted via e-mail by John.Christodouleas@elekta.com

      It seems to me that the proposal is using “Radiotherapy Volume” as the linkage between the Summary and the Phases.  For Radiotherapy Volume to work as a linkage field, it would need to be explicitly non-overlapping. That is, you wouldn’t be able to sum doses across phases unless they are non-overlapping. Do you agree and is this your intention?

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            Assignee:
            Unassigned Unassigned
            Reporter:
            saul_kravitz Saul Kravitz
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: