XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • SMART on FHIR (FHIR)
    • 2.0.0
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • App Launch: Scopes and Launch Context
    • 2.3.2.1
    • Hide

      Access Token Response
      "access_token": "xyz...",
      "patient": "123",
      "fhirContext": ["DiagnosticReport/123", "Organization/789"]

      --> array of relative resource References to any resource type other than "Patient" or "Encounter".

      • Move "Appointment" out of the table of launch context (can cover it via this new fhirContext mechanism)
      • Would we deprecate the more specific params like "patient"? No, would keep these, and would not deprecate or duplicate them in the fhirContext array. (i.e., we'd prohibit Patient and Encounter). It is not prohibited to have more than one reference to a given type of resource.
      • Could (and how would) a client request context like a DiagnosticReport? Yes, by asking for a scope like "launch/diagnosticreport" or "launch/organization" (i.e., lowercased FHIR resource types).
      • In spec, include rationale for separating out these properties (i.e. the aim is to allow flexibility; maintain backwards compatibility; keep a predictable JSON structure)

       

       

       

      Show
      Access Token Response "access_token": "xyz...", "patient": "123", "fhirContext": ["DiagnosticReport/123", "Organization/789"] --> array of relative resource References to any resource type other than "Patient" or "Encounter". Move "Appointment" out of the table of launch context (can cover it via this new fhirContext mechanism) Would we deprecate the more specific params like "patient"? No, would keep these, and would not deprecate or duplicate them in the fhirContext array. (i.e., we'd prohibit Patient and Encounter). It is not prohibited to have more than one reference to a given type of resource. Could (and how would) a client request context like a DiagnosticReport? Yes, by asking for a scope like "launch/diagnosticreport" or "launch/organization" (i.e., lowercased FHIR resource types ). In spec, include rationale for separating out these properties (i.e. the aim is to allow flexibility; maintain backwards compatibility; keep a predictable JSON structure)      
    • Bas van den Heuvel / Alexander Zautke: 10-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      The examples mentioned earlier above hinted the current organization could be one of them. This sounds like a good idea.

      In line with FHIRcast I would also add diagnostic report, appointment and imagingstudy

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            carl-anderson-msft Carl Anderson (Inactive)
            bvdh Bas van den Heuvel
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: