Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Medium
-
US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
-
1.16.0 [deprecated]
-
Clinical Interoperability Council
-
(many)
-
-
David Pyke/Marti Velezis: 6-1-0
-
Correction
-
Non-substantive
-
Yes
Description
Should all mCode profiles use the CancerPatient profile in the .subject elements? For example, in the Radiotherapy Volume profile on BodyStructure, .patient is required but the reference is to the base Patient resource. Similarly, Comorbidities Elihauser profile on Observation doesn't constrain .subject at all (it allows Group, Device and Location in addition to Patient). Unless a non CancerPatient profile makes sense, I suggest that the mCode profile is used.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-23069 Affirmative - Craig Newman : 2021-May-FHIR IG MCODE R1 STU
- Closed
-
BALLOT-23080 Affirmative - Craig Newman : 2021-May-FHIR IG MCODE R1 STU
- Closed