Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-31833

Why is property.category 0..1?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • R4
    • Biomedical Research & Regulation
    • SubstanceDefinition
    • Hide

      we don't see a need to categorize by multiple things, but will add a value set of at least example binding strength, possibly extensible.

       

      Later: Other changes got rid of this issue - see comments

      Show
      we don't see a need to categorize by multiple things, but will add a value set of at least example binding strength, possibly extensible.   Later: Other changes got rid of this issue - see comments
    • Rik Smithies /Norman Gregory: 10-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • Yes
    • R5

    Description

      Normally when we have categories, we allow things to be categorized many ways. If we expect there's only one mechanism for categorization, why isn't it a code with a required binding?

      Proposed Wording:

      lloyd@lmckenzie.com

      (Comment 58 - imported by: Ron G. Parker)

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Rongparker Ron G. Parker
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: