Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci DEQM (FHIR)
-
2.1.0 [deprecated]
-
Clinical Quality Information
-
Gaps in Care Reporting
-
2.5.3.2
-
-
Yan Heras/Bryn Rhodes:11-0-0
-
Correction
-
Non-compatible
Description
The "closed gap" language suggests that what is new is that a previously identified problem, since fixed, won't just stop showing up, but may appear as a former problem now fixed. That sounds like a distinction with QM, but I don't see instructios on how to do that, or any examples.
Might a closed gap be a detected issue with a status of "resolved"? (That would be a meaning of 'status' different from the one currently in place.)
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-13644 Negative - Vannak Kann : 2020-Sep-FHIR IG QMEXCHANGE R1 STU
- Closed