Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
-
current
-
Clinical Interoperability Council
-
HRex Coverage Profile
-
9.8.1 Resource Profile: HRexCoverage
-
-
Marti Velezis / James Tcheng : 6-0-1
Description
Is beneficiary coverage cost really minimally necessary? Minimum necessary requirements would apply, so I guess as far as the beneficiary cost info, it might depend on how the old payer defines minimum necessary for care coordination (or whatever health care operation they’re using to justify the exchange). Could lead to price fixing/anti trust concerns.
Existing Wording:
Coverage.costToBeneficiary.type
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-13504 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2020-Sep-FHIR IG HRex R1 STU
- Balloted
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...