Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-28862

Should it say old and not new?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US Da Vinci HRex (FHIR)
    • current
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • HRex Parameters - Member Match Response Profile
    • 9.10.1 Resource Profile
    • Hide

      The intention here is to echo back the new plan as that's the linkage that we're trying to establish.  We will update the description to make more clear why it's being passed back.  (Technically, it's not necessary as the linkage can be done through the request, but this was done for convenience of the implementers.)

      Show
      The intention here is to echo back the new plan as that's the linkage that we're trying to establish.  We will update the description to make more clear why it's being passed back.  (Technically, it's not necessary as the linkage can be done through the request, but this was done for convenience of the implementers.)
    • Marti Velezis / Jimmy Tcheng : 6-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Old? This is the old plan’s response, correct?

      Existing Wording:

      • The new health plan coverage resource.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            celine_lefebvre Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: