Details
-
Type:
Change Request
-
Status: Applied (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Highest
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Specification:US FHIR Guidance - Quality Reporting (FHIR)
-
Raised in Version:0.1
-
Work Group:Clinical Quality Information
-
Related Page(s):Home
-
Related Section(s):Expressivity
-
Grouping:
-
Resolution Description:
-
Resolution Vote:Floyd Eisenberg/Ben Hamlin: 23-2-0
-
Change Category:Clarification
-
Change Impact:Non-substantive
Description
- What is a timing relationship?
- Why using timing relationship is not good?
- May be an example could help?
Existing Wording:
These relationships are a critical aspect of establishing relevant criteria in a quality measure, but have traditionally been expressed using timing relationships between the data elements, rather than direct references expressed in the information model.
Proposed Wording:
?
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-12626 Affirmative - Javier Espina : 2020-May-QUALREPORT R1 Inform
- Balloted