• Why do we need to relate Expressivity, Alignment and Fitness in this section? This seems to be something more to the summary. the Alignment and Fitness are even not officially defined yet.
• The 'Semantic Fitness' is named just 'Fitness' In the table on page 9. Please make this consistent.

Existing Wording:

Expressivity, Alignment, and Semantic Fitness are related concepts. Expressivity addresses whether explicit, unambiguous meaning can be sufficiently represented in a model. Alignment addresses closeness of data semantics across use cases, most importantly existing systems of record. Fitness addresses how closely data semantics convey or express real-world concepts.

Proposed Wording:

?